What accounting treatments should be considered under US GAAP?
A US company receives USD 1,000,000 in stablecoins to settle a customer receivable. The controller should not begin with the token's volatility. The first question is contractual: does the company have an enforceable redemption right, against whom, in which currency and subject to what conditions? That answer determines whether the token falls within the US crypto-asset model or requires a different analysis.
Start with the holder's rights
ASU 2023-08 introduced Subtopic 350-60 for certain crypto assets. Its scope requires six cumulative conditions: the asset is intangible; it provides no enforceable rights to underlying goods, services or other assets; it resides on a distributed ledger; it is secured through cryptography; it is fungible; and it was not created or issued by the reporting entity or a related party.
A redeemable stablecoin should therefore not be labelled automatically as a Subtopic 350-60 asset. A contractual claim against the issuer or another counterparty may fail the no-underlying-right criterion. Accounting should retain the issuance terms, account agreement, redemption policy and legal identity of the obligor. A one-dollar target and a token name are not evidence of the holder's rights.
When all six criteria are met
An asset within Subtopic 350-60 is measured at fair value at each reporting date, with changes recognised in net income. The amendments apply to fiscal years beginning after 15 December 2024, including interim periods. They also require disclosures about significant holdings, cost basis, fair value, units and certain contractual sale restrictions.
The close file should identify each asset, document the price source, reconcile units and flag restrictions. The ASU does not by itself answer every initial-recognition or derecognition question.
When the token carries an enforceable claim
If the stablecoin gives its holder an enforceable redemption right, the company must identify the nature of that right under the other applicable US GAAP rather than defaulting to the crypto-asset fair-value model. The answer depends on the contract, counterparty, restrictions and settlement mechanics. A marketing statement about dollar stability is insufficient; the file must show who owes what.
The accounting memo should answer four separate questions: what legal asset is held; which guidance applies; how the balance is measured initially and subsequently; and which disclosures explain liquidity, concentration and restrictions. Each conclusion should point to the supporting contract clause.
Worked example: two one-dollar tokens
Hypothetical case. A company holds 600,000 units of token A and 400,000 units of token B, both trading around USD 1 when received.
Token A gives the company a direct dollar redemption claim against the issuer, subject to identity checks. The team documents the obligor, presentment conditions and restrictions. It does not apply Subtopic 350-60 without first analysing that claim.
No direct claim on reserves, an issuer or another asset can be established for token B. If B also meets the other five criteria, it may fall within Subtopic 350-60. A reporting-date fair value of USD 0.98 would produce a USD 392,000 carrying amount and an USD 8,000 negative change from USD 400,000. The calculation illustrates the measurement; it does not replace the scope assessment.
The controller's deliverable
BECTRA structures a token-by-token classification memo covering the contract and counterparty, holder rights, the six-criterion test, selected guidance, measurement, price source, entries and disclosures. A reconciliation then links units, addresses, custodian records, the ledger and the reporting date.
This keeps assets with different rights and measurement models out of a single undifferentiated account. It also lets a reviewer reproduce the decision without relying on the stablecoin's commercial label.
Conclusion
Under US GAAP, “stablecoin” is not a sufficient accounting category. The controller starts with enforceable rights. Subtopic 350-60 applies only when all six criteria are met; otherwise the company documents the applicable model from the contract and facts.
Further reading
Sources
Comments